Page 82 - ISMCON souvenir 2021
P. 82

ISMSCON - 2021

          period. On comparing gender distribution more number of male patients died as compared to
          female patients but it was not significant. Age group analysis presented that majority of patients
          died in 60-74 age group whereas majority of patients died having length of stay 0-7 days. Bivariate
          Logistic regression reflect that there was significant influence of age group and length of stay on the
          mortality of Covid19 positive patients (χ2(9) =495.30, P<.001).
          Conclusion:  Compulsory vaccination  in significant  Age Group and early detection is essential for
          reducing mortality of Covid 19 patients
          Keywords: COVID-19, AGE, Gender, Length of stay, Mortality, Demographic Risk Factors



           OS54: COMPARISON OF  IMPUTATION  METHODS USING RE-

           SAMPLING TECHNIQUES IN NFHS-4 DATA

                                           Seena Thomas K , K. Thennarasu     2
                                                             1
                    1Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, Christ (Deemed to be) University, Bengaluru
                             2Professor and Head, Department of Biostatistics, NIMHANS, Bangalore
                                    seena.thomas@christuniversity.in, kthenna@gmail.com


          INTRODUCTION: The field of survey research is an important area where incomplete data occur. After
          imputing the missing values in the survey data, resampling technique can be used to check the efficiency
          of the imputation methods, since there is no full data to compare the estimates. Resampling is a procedure
          which permits to draw samples again and again from a dataset and to refit the model for each sample in
          order to get additional information.

          METHODOLOGY: NFHS-4 Delhi data for women was considered for the current study of comparison of
          imputation methods which had the highest proportion of missing data compared to all other regions across
          the country. Delhi region data, consists of 5914 subjects among which 1337 (22.61%) had unobserved
          data for at least one of the variables considered in the study. From the complete data with 4577 (77.39%)
          subjects, subsamples of varying sample sizes 50, 100, 200, 500, 800 and 1000 were selected randomly
          and created missing-ness under varying proportions of missing data (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5) under MAR
          mechanism. During this process 1000 datasets of each sample sizes were selected randomly, induced
          missing-ness  and imputation  was done using various imputation  methods. Multiple  linear  regression
          model was fitted  for  to  predict BMI  from  the covariates Age, Hb, Glucose and SBP. The imputation
          methods were compared using the point estimates (mean, SD and SE), regression coefficients, R Akaike
                                                                                                       2,
          information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) values of multiple linear regression.
          The p-values produced by the comparison of imputed data sets were considered for the Hotelling T2 test
          and Box’s M test.
          RESULTS: The model based methods Multiple Imputation (MI), Quantile Regression (QR) imputation
          (QR), Regression Imputation (REG) and stochastic Regression  Imputation (SREG) performed  better
          than donor based methods while comparing with the estimates of complete data. Among the donor based
          methods Fractional Imputation method (FI) and Propensity score method (PS) were better than the other
          donor based methods.
          CONCLUSION: All the model based methods performed better than donor based methods under the
          MAR mechanism while comparing with the estimates of complete data.
          KEYWORDS: Simulation, MAR mechanism, NFHS data, Multiple Imputation, Quantile Regression
          Imputation.







          80                                                                        CONFERENCE SOUVENIR
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87